“The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars but in
ourselves.”
-- William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
An Unheralded Facet of Risk
A recent pair of circulars to Leithner & Co. shareholders (The Mass
Media and Value Investing, Part I and The Mass Media and Value Investing, Part
II) set out the damage which market participants, aided and abetted by the
mass media, can do to themselves. They showed that the media can reflect a
herd mentality. One consequence of this mentality is that speculators who
erroneously believe themselves to be investors either pay good money for poor
businesses or pay too much for sound businesses (or both). By catering to
their audience’s proclivity towards greed, fear and folly, mass media reports
increase the risk that speculators will incur substantial and permanent loss
of capital.
Company executives and their legal, financial and management consultants
can also contribute to the destruction of shareholders’ equity. Like all other
aspects of business, corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are
inherently risky propositions. The stark – but usually unuttered – reality
is that many and perhaps most M&As fail to achieve what their
highly-remunerated and jargon-spewing creators confidently claim that they
will achieve. Disturbingly, corporate deal-makers are seldom in doubt but
often in error. In Warren Buffett’s words: “the sad fact is that most
major acquisitions display an egregious imbalance: they are a bonanza for the
shareholders of the acquiree; they increase the income and status of the
acquirer’s management; and they are a honeypot for the investment bankers and
other professionals on both sides. But, alas, they usually reduce the wealth
of the acquirer’s shareholders, often to a substantial extent.”
Hence my strong preference that the companies in which Leithner & Co.
has invested are the ones being bought rather than the ones doing the buying.
And notwithstanding the Ralph Review’s incentives to do otherwise, if and when
these companies receive a credible offer of merger or notice of takeover, I
will generally sell our shares for cash in the open market (at prices which
will usually be inflated beyond their intrinsic value by the confident buyer’s
generous offer) rather than swap them for the buyer’s shares.
Two new circulars to shareholders, Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: A
Contrarian Case for Caution (I) and Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: A
Contrarian Case for Caution (II), dated 1 June and 15 June respectively,
describe the considerable and growing risks posed by M&As – and, by
extension, investment bankers, corporate lawyers and management consultants.

Buffett and Munger Account to their Shareholders
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. (BRK), a company oriented unflichingly towards the
well-being of its shareholders (and which since the 1960s has arguably created
more real wealth per share than any other company) held its Annual Meeting at
Omaha, Nebraska on 29 April. In several respects its yearly gathering is unique.
Most notably, it is one of the world’s largest corporate AGMs. An estimated
15,000 shareholders, a majority of those on its register and hailing from across
the U.S. and a range of countries including Australia, Britain and Canada, took
the time and trouble to attend. Second, the meeting’s formalities are concluded
extremely quickly (normally within 10 minutes). Third, after the formalities’
conclusion there ensues an informal question-and-answer session which lasts up
to six hours. Asking the questions are BRK’s shareholders – no queries from
journalists, please, they’ll be answered at a news conference after the meeting.
Sitting alone on stage to underscore their responsibility and to answer
questions are Berkshire’s Chairman (Warren Buffett) and Vice-Chairman (Charles
Munger). Fourth, and perhaps most admirably, Buffett and Munger respond clearly,
completely and frankly to the questions which shareholders put to them.
Because Berkshire’s executives are demonstrably among the world’s ablest, the
company’s shareholders are a select – and, thanks to Messrs Buffett and Munger,
wealthy – breed. (Omaha alone boasts more than 50 “Buffett
Millionaires.”) Not surprisingly, Berkshire’s 2000 AGM was covered
extensively by the American and international news media. (It is as
disappointing as it is revealing, however, that The Australian Financial
Review accorded it only a few sentences on 1 May and none on subsequent
days). The coverage in outlets such as The Wall Street Journal Interactive
Edition reflected Buffett’s and Munger’s formidable intelligence, wit and
pithy turns of phrase.
Among the highlights of this year’s Q&A:
- The Internet: Mr Buffett stated that he was unsure whether the
Internet would pose more threats or opportunities to businesses. It will,
however, “become an increasingly important issue on how it affects our
businesses.” The Internet would (through lower prices, greater choice and
convenience) benefit consumers. At the same, time, however, because the
Internet would erode profit margins more than it would facilitate corporate
efficiency, it would prove to be a “net negative for capitalists. it
will make American business, in aggregate, worth less than it otherwise would
have been.”
- Sky-High Prices and Market Capitalisations: Mr Buffett likened the
current frenzy of speculation on Wall Street to the principle which underlies
a chain letter. Early signers-on may make money, sometimes considerable
amounts of it, but in the end larger numbers will lose even larger amounts. He
and Mr Munger “have seen a lot of cases where valuations in the high side
are unbelievable [and] don’t see any great cases of dramatic undervaluation in
this market.” Mr Buffett noted that some companies which have a market
capitalisation of $10 billion are not sufficiently creditworthy to borrow $200
million from a bank. Yet their individual owners could borrow 20 times that
amount. This imbalance is “as extreme as anything that has happened – including the 20s.” Mr Munger called it ”the most extreme event in
modern capitalism.” Mr Buffett therefore warned that investors should
reduce their expectations and feared that ”looking back, you will see
this as a period of enormous amounts of wealth being transferred.” He
added that he did not know how extensive this transfer would be, or whether it
would affect particular sectors of financial markets, the entire market, parts
of the real economy or the entire economy: “in five or ten years we’ll
know.” In the long run and at all times, however, “valuation does
count.”
- Day-Trading and Other Forms of Reckless Speculation: at the press
conference following the AGM, Mr Buffett said that many people today regard
the stock market as a casino, and therefore that they speculate rather than
invest. “It’s assinine,” he said of their capital allocation
decisions. “They are influenced by rumour, what neighbours tell them and
what they see on TV. They don’t pay nearly enough attention as when they are
buying a TV set.”
- Tech Stocks: Mr Buffett repeated his oft-stated view that he is unable
to estimate the intrinsic value of technology companies. “We have no
religious belief that we don’t buy into technology companies. But we’ve never
found one where we think we know what the business will look like in 10
years.”
- Excessive Executive Remuneration: Messrs
Buffett and Munger criticised the extraordinary remuneration currently granted
to many corporate executives. Mr Munger likened some corporate compensation
schemes to “putting a rat colony in a granary.” Both clearly believe
that such practices serve shareholders poorly. They also indicated that some of
the stock option plans proliferating on Wall Street pose significant risks to
shareholders. This is because many of those receiving options “inherently
know that they have a lottery ticket” – and may tend to behave
accordingly.
- Financial Advisors and Management Consultants: at the press conference on the day after the AGM, Mr Buffett stated that
serious investors should pay little heed to what they hear on television or
read in the newspaper about either the stock market or specific companies.
Further, financial advice “is basically not worth anything.”
Finally, he criticised management and other consultants, asking shareholders
rhetorically if Andrew Carnegie would have asked an investment banker whether
he (Carnegie) should purchase another steel mill.

Links to More Information About This Year’s Berkshire Hathaway Shindig
Summing Up
As the American actor James Stewart demonstrated in It’s a Wonderful Life, it is indeed a wonderful life. But as the Bedford Falls
Savings and Loan Association manager whom he portrayed knew very well, it is also an inherently uncertain life. Human action, we should always remind ourselves, has not just intended consequences, but also unintended and unforeseeable consequences (“each man’s life touches so many other lives, and when he isn’t around he leaves an awful hole.”).
Yet many members of the general public, many businesses and their advisors and most governments continue to underrate this uncertainty. Some, indeed, display overconfidence bordering on hubris with respect to their ability to navigate through it; and a select few breezily dismiss the probability that their actions will have negative, harmful or unintended consequences. Therein lie both risks and rewards. As Mr Buffett concluded during Berkshire’s AGM: “the ability [today] to monetise share holding ignorance has never been exceeded.”
Chris Leithner
Disclaimer
Click Here for Detailed Instructions on How to Print the Newsletter
 |
| Australian Market News |
 |
 |
Daily Market
Commentary
A summary of events affecting the market over the previous
24 hours and is brought to you by Merrill
Lynch. |
 |
IndexSnapshot
The All Ordinaries Share Price Index, ASX 100, Trans-Tasman
100 and the Asian Index updated periodically throughout the
day. |

|
Market Summary
Key market statistics, updated nightly.
|
|
|